Bank Bailout Menus 1
نویسندگان
چکیده
1 We thank Christopher Hennessy for valuable discussions and comments as well as two referees Abstract Bank Bailout Menus We study bailouts of banks that suffer from debt overhang problems and have private information about the quality of their assets-in-place and new investment opportunities. Menus of bailout plans are used as a screening device. Worse bank types choose larger bailouts. Constrained-optimality involves overcapitalization of banks and nonlinear pricing (e.g. the bailout agency receives proportionally more shares in larger bailouts). Equity injections and asset buyouts are equivalent when new investments follow the assets. The larger capital outlay involved in asset buyouts can be offset by borrowing against the assets. If investments follow the bank, equity injections offer more upside to the bailout agency than asset buyouts. But upside can damage as well as enhance efficiency, depending on whether screening intensity is needed mostly on assets-in-place or new investments.
منابع مشابه
The Indirect Ethics of AIG’s ‘Backdoor Bailout’
We experimentally assess the ethics of the U.S. government’s indirect bailout of the bank counterparties of American International Group (AIG) during the 2008 financial crisis. When the indirect bailout is jointly compared with a counterfactual where the government directly bails out the banks, subjects judge the indirect bailout to be far more unethical. On the other hand, when the two scenari...
متن کاملBailouts and bank runs: Theory and evidence from TARP
During the recent Financial Crisis, there were bank runs right after government bailout announcements. This paper develops a global game model of information based bank runs to analyze how the announcement of bailouts affects investors’ bank run incentives. The equilibrium probability of bank runs is uniquely determined. I conclude that before the announcement, the existence of such bailout pol...
متن کاملDueling policies: Why systemic risk taxation can fail ¬リニ
Two policy instruments for the banking sector are investigated, namely systemic risk taxation and constructive ambiguity about bailout policy. Bailout expectations can induce moral hazard in the form of excessive risk taking by banks. Systemic risk taxation induces banks to prefer uncorrelated investments, leading to lower systemic risk formation. Constructive ambiguity generates uncertainty ab...
متن کاملBailout Policy and Risk-Taking Behavior
• I am especially indebted to Robert Marquez for many insightful discussions. I am also grateful to Larry Ausubel, and Steven Ongena for their comments and suggestions. Any remaining errors are my own. Abstract We set up a model to analyze the banks' risk-taking and funding decisions (between insured and uninsured funds), in a regulatory framework that includes both unfairly priced deposit insu...
متن کاملDoes Size Matter? Bailouts with Large and Small Banks
Yes, size actually matters. This paper models the strategic interaction between banks and the government when bailouts are possible. I analyze how imperfect common knowledge about the government’s bailout policy affects the ex-ante leverage choice for each bank. Large banks, by internalizing the effect of their size on the likelihood of being bailed out, are willing to take more leverage. In eq...
متن کامل